\begin{tabular}{l} Question \( 3 / 5 \) \\ Which of the following would NOT be considered a primary- nor a secondary-source document? \\ A. A poem by the ancient Greek poet Homer \\ B. A skeleton of a woman found in the Andes mountains \\ D. A letter written by King James I \\ Catia entry on Emperor Mehmet II \\ \hline\end{tabular}

To determine which option would NOT be considered a primary or secondary source document, let's first clarify what primary and secondary sources are: - **Primary sources** are original materials that provide direct evidence or firsthand accounts of an event, object, person, or work of art. Examples include diaries, letters, photographs, and artifacts. - **Secondary sources** are interpretations or analyses of primary sources. They often summarize, interpret, or critique primary sources. Examples include textbooks, articles, and biographies. Now, let's analyze each option: A. **A poem by the ancient Greek poet Homer** - This is a primary source as it is an original work of literature. B. **A skeleton of a woman found in the Andes mountains** - This is also a primary source as it is a physical artifact that provides direct evidence of a historical or archaeological context. C. **A letter written by King James I** - This is a primary source as it is an original document created by a historical figure. D. **Catia entry on Emperor Mehmet II** - This option is less clear. If "Catia" refers to a modern database or encyclopedia entry, it would be considered a secondary source because it summarizes or interprets information about Emperor Mehmet II rather than providing original evidence. Based on this analysis, the option that would NOT be considered a primary or secondary source document is: **D. Catia entry on Emperor Mehmet II**.