Pregunta
upstudy study bank question image url

Use the excerpt from the Supreme Court majority opinion in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, written by Justice Fortas, to answer the question. Why does Justice Fortas include a counterargument in the majority opinion? (1 point) to indicate the Court is divided on its final ruling to show how the Court applies legal reasoning and constitutional principles to explain how the Court views its power of judicial review

Ask by Young Davison. in the United States
Jan 23,2025

Solución de tutoría real

Respuesta verificada por el tutor

Responder

Justice Fortas includes a counterargument to show how the Court uses legal reasoning and constitutional principles to explain its view on judicial review.

Solución

Justice Fortas includes a counterargument in the majority opinion **to show how the Court applies legal reasoning and constitutional principles to explain how the Court views its power of judicial review**. By addressing opposing viewpoints, the Court demonstrates a thorough analysis and reinforces the validity of its ruling based on established legal frameworks. **Correct Answer:** to show how the Court applies legal reasoning and constitutional principles to explain how the Court views its power of judicial review

Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy

error msg
Explicar
Simplifique esta solución

Beyond the Answer

Justice Fortas includes a counterargument in the majority opinion to show how the Court applies legal reasoning and constitutional principles. By addressing opposing views, he strengthens the Court's position and demonstrates a thorough consideration of the complex issues surrounding student free speech. This not only enhances the credibility of the ruling but also illustrates the delicate balance between individual rights and school authority. Additionally, incorporating a counterargument helps to clarify the rationale behind the Court's decision. It's an essential part of judicial reasoning, allowing the justices to explain why certain arguments may be insufficient or flawed, thereby guiding readers through their legal thought process and reinforcing the importance of protecting constitutional rights even in school settings.

preguntas relacionadas

Latest Social Sciences Questions

¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde Hazte Premium
Estudiar puede ser una verdadera lucha
¿Por qué no estudiarlo en UpStudy?
Seleccione su plan a continuación
Prima

Puedes disfrutar

Empieza ahora
  • Explicaciones paso a paso
  • Tutores expertos en vivo 24/7
  • Número ilimitado de preguntas
  • Sin interrupciones
  • Acceso completo a Respuesta y Solución
  • Acceso completo al chat de PDF, al chat de UpStudy y al chat de navegación
Básico

Totalmente gratis pero limitado

  • Solución limitada
Bienvenido a ¡Estudia ahora!
Inicie sesión para continuar con el recorrido de Thoth AI Chat
Continuar con correo electrónico
O continuar con
Al hacer clic en "Iniciar sesión", acepta nuestros términos y condiciones. Términos de Uso & Política de privacidad