Freedom of speech can be silenced whltiple Choice when it is highly likely that immediate harm will result from the speech.

In the realm of free speech, there’s a famous case from 1919, Schenck v. United States, where the Supreme Court ruled that speech presenting a "clear and present danger" could be limited. This case arose during World War I when Charles Schenck distributed leaflets opposing the draft. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes articulated that the right to free speech does not protect speech that incites unlawful conduct or poses an immediate threat to public safety. In today's digital age, social media platforms grapple with the fine line between protecting free speech and preventing harm. For instance, misinformation can spread quickly online, leading to real-world consequences. When platforms take action against harmful speech, it raises questions about censorship versus safeguarding communities, illustrating the ongoing debate about the limits of free speech in the context of immediacy and potential harm.