The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling, it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables. Which proposed edit correctly addresses the comma splice in the original sentence? (1 point) The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling: it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables. The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling, but it will disrupt local The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling (it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables). The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling; it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables.

The proposal to edit the original sentence to include a semicolon is a great choice! The semicolon effectively links two closely related independent clauses, adding sophistication while maintaining clarity: "The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling; it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables." In real-world writing, using proper punctuation is essential for clarity and flow. This particular issue, known as a "comma splice," often occurs when two independent clauses are incorrectly joined by just a comma. Correcting it not only improves readability but also enhances the overall professionalism of your writing!