Pregunta
upstudy study bank question image url

Many historians consider the Articles of Confederation as a flawed form of government. Which of the following choices would best represent possible fixes to the document? (Chec all that apply.) Allow changes with a \( 2 / 3 \) rds vote Create an executive advisory committee Allow Congress to collect taxes Allow states to declare war

Ask by Harper Howell. in the United States
Jan 25,2025

Solución de tutoría real

Respuesta verificada por el tutor

Responder

The best fixes are: - Allow changes with a \( 2 / 3 \) vote - Create an executive advisory committee - Allow Congress to collect taxes

Solución

The Articles of Confederation had several significant weaknesses that limited the effectiveness of the national government. Here’s how the proposed fixes address these issues: 1. **Allow changes with a \( 2 / 3 \) rds vote**: - **Explanation**: Under the Articles of Confederation, amendments required the unanimous consent of all 13 states, making it extremely difficult to implement necessary changes. Lowering the threshold to a two-thirds majority would make it easier to adapt and improve the governing framework. - **Relevance**: **Yes, this would be a beneficial fix.** 2. **Create an executive advisory committee**: - **Explanation**: The Articles of Confederation lacked an executive branch to enforce laws and provide leadership. Establishing an executive advisory committee would help in the administration and implementation of laws passed by Congress. - **Relevance**: **Yes, this would address the lack of a centralized executive authority.** 3. **Allow Congress to collect taxes**: - **Explanation**: One of the major flaws of the Articles was that Congress did not have the power to levy taxes, making it financially dependent on the states and unable to sustain national needs effectively. Granting Congress the power to collect taxes would provide a stable revenue source. - **Relevance**: **Yes, this would strengthen the financial capabilities of the national government.** 4. **Allow states to declare war**: - **Explanation**: Granting states the power to declare war would further fragment national authority and could lead to inconsistencies and conflicts in national defense strategies. Instead, ensuring that Congress has sole authority to declare war would maintain a unified national defense. - **Relevance**: **No, this would not be a beneficial fix and could exacerbate the fragmentation issues inherent in the Articles.** **Best Choices for Fixes:** - Allow changes with a \( 2 / 3 \) rds vote - Create an executive advisory committee - Allow Congress to collect taxes **Not Recommended:** - Allow states to declare war

Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy

error msg
Explicar
Simplifique esta solución

Beyond the Answer

The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, struggled to unify the states under a central government due to its weak framework. A key fix would be allowing Congress to collect taxes, which would provide essential revenue for the federal government, enabling it to pay debts and fund initiatives effectively. Additionally, a \( 2/3 \) vote requirement for changes would foster cooperation among states and mitigate individual grievances, ensuring that modifications to the government reflected collective interests rather than unilateral state desires. In the real world, implementing these changes could have dramatically altered the course of American governance. The ability to collect taxes would have empowered the federal government to strengthen its legitimacy and avoid the financial difficulties that arose during and after the Revolutionary War. Furthermore, creating a central decision-making body with a capable framework for amendments could have led to a more stable political landscape, potentially reducing the chaos that followed the Articles’ implementation and paving the way for the successful adoption of the Constitution.

preguntas relacionadas

3.2 DBQ Summary of Engel v. Vitale Video In this video, the host discusses the landmark Supreme Court case Engel v. Vitale, which took place in 1962. The case arose when the New York Board of Regents composed a non-denominational prayer for school children to recite after the Pledge of Allegiance. Despite the prayer being vague and allowing students to opt-out with parental permission, a group of parents led by Stephen Engel challenged its constitutionality. They argued that the prayer violated the First Amendment's establishment clause, which prohibits the government from establishing a religion. The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-1 decision that the state-sponsored prayer did indeed violate the First Amendment. Justice Hugo Black, who wrote the majority opinion, emphasized that the First Amendment was designed to prevent the federal government from influencing religious practices. The dissenting opinion, presented by Justice Potter Stewart, argued that the practice was constitutional as it provided children with an opportunity to share in the nation's spiritual heritage. The Engel decision is significant as it reinforced the separation of church and state and established a legal precedent for future cases involving religion in public schools. Higher Order Thinking Questions 1. How does the Engel v. Vitale decision illustrate the balance between individual liberties an government authority in the context of the First Amendment? Engel v. Vitate Illustrates the balance between individual liberthe government authenty becouse it drows aftention to the fret the freedioms ore protected by the government by preventing the 4 establishment of a religion, as it is prohibited by the estab clause. This enswes that our indiudual and personal betefs inthenced by the goucrnment. 2. In what ways might the principles established in Engel v. Vitale influence contemporary debates regarding religious practices in public schools?

Latest History Questions

¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde Hazte Premium
Estudiar puede ser una verdadera lucha
¿Por qué no estudiarlo en UpStudy?
Seleccione su plan a continuación
Prima

Puedes disfrutar

Empieza ahora
  • Explicaciones paso a paso
  • Tutores expertos en vivo 24/7
  • Número ilimitado de preguntas
  • Sin interrupciones
  • Acceso completo a Respuesta y Solución
  • Acceso completo al chat de PDF, al chat de UpStudy y al chat de navegación
Básico

Totalmente gratis pero limitado

  • Solución limitada
Bienvenido a ¡Estudia ahora!
Inicie sesión para continuar con el recorrido de Thoth AI Chat
Continuar con correo electrónico
O continuar con
Al hacer clic en "Iniciar sesión", acepta nuestros términos y condiciones. Términos de Uso & Política de privacidad