Many historians consider the Articles of Confederation as a flawed form of government. Which of the following choices would best represent possible fixes to the document? (Chec all that apply.) Allow changes with a \( 2 / 3 \) rds vote Create an executive advisory committee Allow Congress to collect taxes Allow states to declare war
Solución de tutoría real
Responder
Solución
Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy
Beyond the Answer
The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, struggled to unify the states under a central government due to its weak framework. A key fix would be allowing Congress to collect taxes, which would provide essential revenue for the federal government, enabling it to pay debts and fund initiatives effectively. Additionally, a \( 2/3 \) vote requirement for changes would foster cooperation among states and mitigate individual grievances, ensuring that modifications to the government reflected collective interests rather than unilateral state desires. In the real world, implementing these changes could have dramatically altered the course of American governance. The ability to collect taxes would have empowered the federal government to strengthen its legitimacy and avoid the financial difficulties that arose during and after the Revolutionary War. Furthermore, creating a central decision-making body with a capable framework for amendments could have led to a more stable political landscape, potentially reducing the chaos that followed the Articles’ implementation and paving the way for the successful adoption of the Constitution.