Pregunta
Saved
Reading Assignment: Freedoms of Speech, Assembly, and the Press
Read the Freedoms of Speech, Assembly, and the Press section and then answer the following questions.
Freedom of speech can be silenced
Multiple Choice
when it is highly likely that immediate harm will result from the speech.
when the speech is unpopular.
under no circumstances.
when the speech has a tendency to incite crime or disturb the public peace.
Read the Freedoms of Speech, Assembly, and the Press section and then answer the following questions.
when it is highly likely that immediate harm will result from the speech.
when the speech is unpopular.
under no circumstances.
when the speech has a tendency to incite crime or disturb the public peace.
Ask by Cross Sanders. in the United States
Jan 23,2025
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Respuesta verificada por el tutor
Responder
Freedom of speech can be silenced when it is highly likely to cause immediate harm or when it incites crime or disrupts public peace.
Solución
To answer the question regarding when freedom of speech can be silenced, let’s analyze the provided options:
-
When it is highly likely that immediate harm will result from the speech.
This option suggests that speech can be restricted if it poses a clear and present danger of causing immediate harm. This aligns with legal standards in many jurisdictions. -
When the speech is unpopular.
This option implies that speech can be silenced simply because it is not favored by the majority. However, freedom of speech protects even unpopular opinions. -
Under no circumstances.
This option suggests that freedom of speech is absolute, which is not the case in legal contexts where certain limitations exist. -
When the speech has a tendency to incite crime or disturb the public peace.
This option indicates that speech can be restricted if it incites illegal actions or disrupts public order, which is also consistent with legal principles.
Based on this analysis, the most accurate answers are:
- When it is highly likely that immediate harm will result from the speech.
- When the speech has a tendency to incite crime or disturb the public peace.
However, if you must choose only one option, the first option is often the most cited in legal contexts regarding the limitation of free speech.
Final Answer: When it is highly likely that immediate harm will result from the speech.
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
Como
error msg
Explicar 
Simplifique esta solución Beyond the Answer
Freedom of speech isn’t absolute! It’s a complex balance between expression and public safety. For instance, shouting “fire” in a crowded theater could lead to chaos, so that’s considered a classic example where speech can be legally restricted if it’s likely to cause immediate harm. This highlights how context matters in these situations!
On a broader scale, the First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution has been at the heart of numerous legal battles. For example, landmark cases like Schenck v. United States and Brandenburg v. Ohio have helped define the limits of free speech against incitement and advocacy of violence. Each case shapes our understanding of freedom in a way that reflects societal values and expectations!
¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde
Hazte Premium
