Question
upstudy study bank question image url

Use the excerpt from the Supreme Court majority opinion in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, written by Justice Fortas, to answer the question. Why does Justice Fortas include a counterargument in the majority opinion? (1 point) to indicate the Court is divided on its final ruling to show how the Court applies legal reasoning and constitutional principles to explain how the Court views its power of judicial review

Ask by Young Davison. in the United States
Jan 23,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

Justice Fortas includes a counterargument to show how the Court uses legal reasoning and constitutional principles to explain its view on judicial review.

Solution

Justice Fortas includes a counterargument in the majority opinion **to show how the Court applies legal reasoning and constitutional principles to explain how the Court views its power of judicial review**. By addressing opposing viewpoints, the Court demonstrates a thorough analysis and reinforces the validity of its ruling based on established legal frameworks. **Correct Answer:** to show how the Court applies legal reasoning and constitutional principles to explain how the Court views its power of judicial review

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

Beyond the Answer

Justice Fortas includes a counterargument in the majority opinion to show how the Court applies legal reasoning and constitutional principles. By addressing opposing views, he strengthens the Court's position and demonstrates a thorough consideration of the complex issues surrounding student free speech. This not only enhances the credibility of the ruling but also illustrates the delicate balance between individual rights and school authority. Additionally, incorporating a counterargument helps to clarify the rationale behind the Court's decision. It's an essential part of judicial reasoning, allowing the justices to explain why certain arguments may be insufficient or flawed, thereby guiding readers through their legal thought process and reinforcing the importance of protecting constitutional rights even in school settings.

Related Questions

Latest Social Sciences Questions

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy