Question
The Aesthetic Movement rejected the
traditional Victorian idea that art must be
useful. Instead, Aesthetic artists insisted art
must be beautiful.
Is the statement true or false?
True
False
|
|
| The Aesthetic Movement rejected the |
| traditional Victorian idea that art must be |
| useful. Instead, Aesthetic artists insisted art |
| must be beautiful. |
| Is the statement true or false? |
| True |
| False |
Ask by Hammond Nguyen. in the United States
Jan 27,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
The statement is true.
Solution
The statement is true. The Aesthetic Movement indeed rejected the traditional Victorian idea that art must have a utilitarian purpose. Instead, Aesthetic artists emphasized that art should be appreciated for its beauty and aesthetic value alone, advocating the idea that “art for art’s sake” is a valid philosophy.
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Extra Insights
The statement is true! The Aesthetic Movement, which flourished in the late 19th century, emphasized the idea that art should be pursued for its beauty alone and not for any moral or practical purpose. Figures like Oscar Wilde and James Whistler championed this belief, suggesting that art exists for art’s sake.
Furthermore, this movement influenced various artistic fields, including literature, painting, and design. Iconic works, such as Whistler’s famous painting “Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1” (also known as “Whistler’s Mother”), illustrate the beauty of form and color with little emphasis on narrative or function, marking a significant shift in artistic philosophy.
