Question
upstudy study bank question image url

In the following argument, identify the premise and conclusion, explain why the argument is deceptive, and identify the type of fallacy it represents. The Congressperson is a member of a national firearms club, so I'm sure she will not suppport a ban on rifles. Choose the correct premise and conclusion of the argument below. A. Premise: I'm sure the Congressperson may suppport a ban on rifles. Conclusion: She is a member of a national firearms club. B. Premise: The Congressperson is a member of a national firearms club. Conclusion: I'm sure she will not suppport a ban on rifles. C. Premise: I'm sure the Congressperson will not suppport a ban on rifles. Conclusion: She is a member of a national firearms club. D. Premise: The Congressperson is a member of a national firearms club. Conclusion: I'm sure she may suppport a ban on rifles.

Ask by Macdonald Hall. in the United States
Jan 23,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

**Premise:** The Congressperson is a member of a national firearms club. **Conclusion:** I'm sure she will not support a ban on rifles. **Deceptive Reasoning:** The argument assumes that membership in a firearms club automatically means opposition to a rifle ban, which is not necessarily true. **Fallacy Type:** Association Fallacy (Guilt by Association).

Solution

The correct identification of the premise and conclusion in the given argument is: **B.** - **Premise:** The Congressperson is a member of a national firearms club. - **Conclusion:** I'm sure she will not support a ban on rifles. ### Explanation: 1. **Premise:** This is the statement that provides the reason or support for the conclusion. In this case, the fact that "The Congressperson is a member of a national firearms club" is presented as the basis for the ensuing claim. 2. **Conclusion:** This is the statement that follows from the premise and is what the argument is trying to prove. Here, the conclusion is "I'm sure she will not support a ban on rifles." ### Why the Argument is Deceptive: The argument is deceptive because it relies on an **association fallacy** (specifically, guilt by association). It assumes that because the Congressperson is a member of a firearms club, she must oppose a rifle ban. This overlooks any individual reasoning or potential reasons she might have for supporting such a ban despite her membership. ### Type of Fallacy: The argument represents the **Association Fallacy** (also known as "Guilt by Association"). This fallacy occurs when someone links an opponent to an undesirable group or position to discredit their argument without addressing the actual issue. **Summary:** - **Premise:** The Congressperson is a member of a national firearms club. - **Conclusion:** I'm sure she will not support a ban on rifles. - **Deceptive Aspect:** Uses association to assume a conclusion without sufficient evidence. - **Fallacy Type:** Association Fallacy (Guilt by Association).

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

Mind Expander

The correct choice is B. Premise: The Congressperson is a member of a national firearms club. Conclusion: I'm sure she will not support a ban on rifles. This argument is deceptive because it relies on an assumption that being part of a firearms club automatically means the Congressperson opposes any form of gun regulation. This oversimplification neglects the complexity of an individual's beliefs and positions, creating a false association. The type of fallacy represented here is known as "hasty generalization," which makes broad conclusions based on insufficient evidence. It's essential to remember that just because someone belongs to a specific group doesn't mean they wholly endorse all of its values or practices. This fallacy can lead to misguided beliefs about individuals based solely on their affiliations. Another fun tidbit: the realm of logical fallacies is vast and filled with quirky names! From "straw man" arguments to "appeals to authority," each fallacy illustrates a unique way our reasoning can veer off course, making it a truly captivating area to explore for anyone looking to sharpen their critical thinking skills. Moreover, if you're looking to dive deeper into logical reasoning and argumentative structures, check out books like "Thank You for Arguing" by Jay Heinrichs or "The Art of Thinking Clearly" by Rolf Dobelli. They offer fantastic insights while being an enjoyable read!

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy