Sandy said that if you know the area for any square, then you can find the side by dividing by 4 . Joe said that's not true, he couldn't support his argument. Sandy said, yes it is. If the area of the square is 16 , then the side is 4 . Who is correct Joe, support his argument. Jose is correct. He could have argued that \( 16 / 4 \) is not 4 . Joe is correct. He could have given a counterexample. For example a square with and area of 25 would have a sid. Sandy is correct. Joe is correct. He could have argued that the formula for perimeter is 4 s for the square. Question 4 Janice said that perimeter is always a bigger number than area. Is Janice correct? If not, give a counterexample to tha statement. Janice is wrong. A square with sides of 2 . Janice is correct. Janice is wrong. A rhombus with diagonals 6 and 8 . Janice is wrong. A right triangle with sides \( 3,4,5 \). Chatw J.
Real Tutor Solution
Answer
Solution
Sign in to Unlock Answers for Free!
A Learning Platform Trusted by Millions of Real Students and Teachers.
Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team
Beyond the Answer
Joe is correct about Sandy's misunderstanding. To find the side length of a square, you actually need to take the square root of the area. So, for an area of 16, it's \( \sqrt{16} = 4 \). If Sandy had said "divide by 4," that wouldn't work for other areas like 25, where dividing by 4 gives you 6.25, which is incorrect. As for Janice, she is wrong. A counterexample is a square with a side length of 1. The area is \( 1^2 = 1 \) while the perimeter is \( 4(1) = 4 \). In this case, the perimeter (4) is greater than the area (1), proving that Janice's statement isn't always true!