Question
upstudy study bank question image url

An arithmetic sequence has a common difference of 8, and \( a_{1}=17 \). Which of these is NOT a valid formula for the \( n \)th term of the sequence? \( a_{n}=17+8(n-1) \) \( a_{n}=8 n+9 \) \( a_{n}=9-8(n-1) \)

Ask by Turner Stewart. in Japan
Jan 24,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

The formula \( a_{n}=9-8(n-1) \) is not valid for the sequence.

Solution

To determine which formula is **not** valid for the \( n \)th term of the arithmetic sequence, let's analyze each option given the information: - **First Term (\( a_1 \))**: 17 - **Common Difference (\( d \))**: 8 The standard formula for the \( n \)th term of an arithmetic sequence is: \[ a_n = a_1 + (n - 1) \cdot d \] Substituting the given values: \[ a_n = 17 + 8(n - 1) \] This simplifies to: \[ a_n = 8n + 9 \] Let's evaluate each option: 1. **\( a_n = 17 + 8(n - 1) \)** - This is the standard formula derived above. - **Valid** 2. **\( a_n = 8n + 9 \)** - This matches the simplified standard formula. - **Valid** 3. **\( a_n = 9 - 8(n - 1) \)** - Simplifying: \[ a_n = 9 - 8n + 8 = 17 - 8n \] - Here, the coefficient of \( n \) is **-8**, which represents a **common difference of -8**, not +8 as given. - Additionally, for \( n = 1 \): \[ a_1 = 17 - 8(1) = 9 \] This contradicts the given first term of 17. - **Not Valid** **Conclusion:** The formula \( a_n = 9 - 8(n - 1) \) does not align with the given first term and common difference of the sequence. **Answer:** \( a_{n}=9-8(n-1) \)

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

The Deep Dive

To determine which formula does not represent the arithmetic sequence with \( a_{1} = 17 \) and a common difference of 8, we can analyze each option. The general formula for the nth term of an arithmetic sequence is \( a_{n} = a_{1} + (n-1)d \), where \( d \) is the common difference. The first formula, \( a_{n}=17+8(n-1) \), is valid as it directly follows the arithmetic sequence formula with \( a_{1} = 17 \) and \( d = 8 \). The second formula, \( a_{n}=8n+9 \), can be evaluated by checking the first term: for \( n=1 \), \( a_{1}=8(1)+9=17 \). While this gives 17, the sequence structure does not reflect the common difference of 8 because the difference between consecutive terms is actually 8, and not constant according to the arithmetic sequence definition. The third formula, \( a_{n}=9-8(n-1) \), simplifies to \( a_{n} = 17 - 8n + 8 \), or \( a_{n} = 25 - 8n \). Substituting \( n = 1 \) gives \( 25 - 8(1) = 17 \). However, for any further values, this quickly diverges from standard form as well. Therefore, although both the second and third formulas seem plausible at first, the second fails to maintain the arithmetic structure—meaning it’s not valid once examined closely in the context.

Latest Pre Algebra Questions

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy