Question
upstudy study bank question image url

In the following argument, identify the premise and conclusion, explain why the argument is deceptive, and, if possible, identify the type of fallacy it represents. Miguel de Cervantes's book Don Quixote is popular because an estimated 500 million copies have been sold since it was published in 1612 . Identify the premise. Choose the correct answer below. A. Miguel de Cervantes's book Don Quixote is popular. B. An estimated 500 million copies have been sold since it was published in 1612 . C. Everyone has read Don Quixote. D. The number of years since 1612 .

Ask by Little Fuentes. in the United States
Jan 23,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

**Premise:** An estimated 500 million copies have been sold since it was published in 1612. **Conclusion:** Miguel de Cervantes's book Don Quixote is popular. **Why Deceptive:** The argument assumes that high sales directly mean the book is popular without considering other factors like historical context or cultural significance. **Fallacy Type:** Appeal to Popularity (Ad Populum)

Solution

**Premise Identification:** The correct premise in the argument is: **B. An estimated 500 million copies have been sold since it was published in 1612.** **Explanation:** In the given argument: - **Premise (Support):** "An estimated 500 million copies have been sold since it was published in 1612." - **Conclusion (Claim):** "Miguel de Cervantes's book Don Quixote is popular." The premise provides evidence to support the conclusion that *Don Quixote* is popular by citing the number of copies sold over time. --- **Why the Argument is Deceptive:** The argument is deceptive because it assumes that the sheer number of copies sold directly equates to the book's popularity without considering other factors that might influence both sales and perceived popularity. This overlooks nuances such as: 1. **Historical Context:** *Don Quixote* was published in 1612, and sales over centuries can accumulate, but this doesn't necessarily reflect its standing in contemporary times. 2. **Cultural Significance vs. Popularity:** A book might be culturally seminal and widely distributed for educational or academic reasons, which doesn't always correlate with current popular appeal. 3. **Sales Figures Reliability:** Estimations of 500 million copies may not account for variations in record-keeping over centuries, translations, and differing editions. By focusing solely on sales numbers, the argument ignores these complexities, leading to a potentially misleading conclusion about the book's popularity. --- **Type of Fallacy:** The argument primarily exhibits an **Appeal to Popularity (Ad Populum)** fallacy. This fallacy occurs when something is deemed true or better solely because it is popular or widely accepted. In this case, the argument suggests that *Don Quixote* is popular simply because a large number of copies have been sold, without providing additional substantive reasons to support the claim of its popularity. --- **Summary:** - **Premise:** B. An estimated 500 million copies have been sold since it was published in 1612. - **Conclusion:** Miguel de Cervantes's book Don Quixote is popular. - **Deceptiveness:** Relies solely on sales figures without considering other factors influencing popularity. - **Fallacy Type:** Appeal to Popularity (Ad Populum)

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

Bonus Knowledge

The premise of the argument is B. An estimated 500 million copies have been sold since it was published in 1612. This statement serves as the foundation upon which the argument is built, suggesting that the high sales figures contribute to the book's popularity. That said, the argument can be quite misleading. Just because many copies have been sold doesn't necessarily mean the book is loved or widely read today. Popularity may stem from factors like historical significance or school curricula rather than genuine reader enjoyment. This may represent a fallacy known as "post hoc ergo propter hoc," implying that one event caused another purely based on correlation.

Related Questions

Latest English Questions

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy