\begin{tabular}{|ll|}\hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{ HUMBLE LEADERS ARE RARE } \\ 1 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{ Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic } \\ Few people would contest the idea that humility is a desirable leadership quality. \\ However, ask those same individuals to name a famous leader, and their choices \\ will likely reflect the reverse: that the most emblematic \( { }^{1} \) and conventional leaders \\ exude arrogance and self-importance, rather than modesty or humility. How do \\ we explain this incongruity? \end{tabular}

The passage discusses the paradox of humility in leadership. It begins by stating that humility is generally regarded as a positive trait for leaders. However, when asked to name famous leaders, people often cite those who display arrogance and self-importance instead of humility. This creates an incongruity between the ideal qualities of leadership and the characteristics of well-known leaders. To analyze this further, we can break down the key points: 1. **Desirability of Humility**: The text asserts that humility is a valued quality in leaders, suggesting that it fosters trust, collaboration, and respect. 2. **Perception of Famous Leaders**: Despite the recognition of humility as a positive trait, the leaders who are most often celebrated or remembered tend to exhibit traits of arrogance and self-importance. 3. **Incongruity**: This leads to the question of how to reconcile the ideal of humble leadership with the reality of the leaders that are often idolized. The passage invites readers to reflect on the qualities that are celebrated in leaders and challenges the notion that humility is a common trait among those who achieve fame and recognition in leadership roles. It suggests a deeper exploration into societal values and the characteristics that are rewarded in leadership contexts.