Question
upstudy study bank question image url

Karl Marx, the founder of conflict theory, believed that ___ is the central force in social change. political science economics religion philosophy

Ask by Sandoval Burgess. in the United States
Jan 27,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

Karl Marx believed that **economics** is the central force in social change.

Solution

Karl Marx, the founder of conflict theory, believed that **economics** is the central force in social change. He argued that the economic structure of society influences its social structure and that class struggles arising from economic inequalities drive historical change.

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

Extra Insights

Karl Marx, the father of conflict theory, argued that economics is the central force in social change. He believed that the structure of society is fundamentally determined by the economic relationships or the means of production. This means that the way people produce and distribute goods shapes their relationships, cultural values, and even political systems, leading to cycles of conflict between the ruling class and the working class. In real-world application, this theory has often been used to analyze economic inequalities in various societies. For example, Marx's perspective helps explain modern issues such as labor disputes, income disparities, and class struggles. As economies shift and transform, the underlying conflicts between different socioeconomic classes can ignite social movements and drive reform, illustrating how economic dynamics can lead to significant societal shifts.

Related Questions

Latest Social Sciences Questions

In the 2020 elections in Colorado, voters were asked to decide whether to amend a voting provision in the state constitution. The provision is shown below, with the change in wording shown by striking out the old wording and using all caps for the amended words. Every-cittzen ONLY A CITIZEN of the United States who has attained the age of eighteen years, has resided in this state for such time as may be prescribed by law, and has been duly registered as a voter if required by law shall be qualified to vote at all elections. The amendment was approved by the voters. Replacing "Every citizen" by "Only a citizen" seems like a minor change in the provision. But what does the change really mean? Complete parts (a) through (c). a. Is there a situation in which a person might qualify to vote under the old provision but not under the new provision? Hint: Consider whether there are any circumstances under which a non-citizen might vote under one wording but not the other. A. Yes; while the old provision says that "every citizen" of the United States meeting the other conditions can vote, it is does not address whether non-citizens might be allowed to vote in some elections. B. Yes; the old provision explicitly states that non-citizens who meet the age, residency, and registration requirements can vote in all elections. C. No; the meanings of the two provisions are the same regarding whether non-citizens might vote. The age, residency, and registration requirements are all the same. D. No; the new provision is actually less restrictive on the voting rights of non-citizens than the old provision. The age, residency, and registration requirements are less restrictive.
Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy