A newsletter publisher believes that over \( 50 \% \) of their readers own a laptop. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.01 level of significance, the advertiser decides to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim?
Real Tutor Solution
Answer
Solution
Sign in to Unlock Answers for Free!
A Learning Platform Trusted by Millions of Real Students and Teachers.
Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team
Bonus Knowledge
The advertiser's decision to reject the null hypothesis suggests that there is significant evidence to support the claim that more than 50% of the newsletter publisher's readers own a laptop. This reinforces the publisher's assertion and indicates a favorable market for advertisers looking to target this tech-savvy audience. However, it's crucial to note the implications of such a conclusion: rejecting the null hypothesis at the 0.01 level of significance means that there is only a 1% chance of mistakenly concluding that more than 50% of readers own a laptop when in fact they do not. Hence, the advertiser can proceed with confidence, but must also be aware of the potential risks involved with statistical conclusions.