Question
- Copper production increased at a rate of about
per
year between 1988 and 1993 . In 1993 , copper production was
approximately 1.801 billion kilograms. If this trend continued,
which is the best model of copper production §, in billions of
kg , since 1993 ?
year between 1988 and 1993 . In 1993 , copper production was
approximately 1.801 billion kilograms. If this trend continued,
which is the best model of copper production §, in billions of
kg , since 1993 ?
Ask by Gray Rogers. in the United States
Jan 21,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
The best model for copper production since 1993 is
.
Solution
To model the copper production growth accurately, we’ll use the exponential growth formula:
Where:
-
is the copper production after years. -
is the initial production. -
is the annual growth rate. -
is the time in years since the initial measurement.
Given:
- Initial production in 1993,
billion kg. - Annual growth rate,
.
Plugging these values into the formula:
Analyzing the Options:
-
Option a:
- Incorrect base. A growth rate of 4.9% should be represented as 1.049, not 4.900.
-
Option b:
- Incorrect base. This suggests a 49% growth rate, which is much higher than the given 4.9%.
-
Option c:
- Correct. This accurately represents a 4.9% annual growth rate.
-
Option d:
- Incorrect base. This implies a dramatic decrease rather than growth.
Conclusion:
The best model for copper production since 1993, considering a 4.9% annual growth rate, is:
The best model for copper production since 1993, considering a 4.9% annual growth rate, is:
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg


The Deep Dive
To model copper production after 1993, you need to account for the annual growth rate of 4.9%. When we express growth as a factor, we add 1 to the growth rate in decimal form. Hence, a 4.9% increase translates to multiplying by 1.049 every year. Therefore, the best model for copper production § is given by the expression in option c:
.
One common mistake when working with percentage growth is to confuse the base growth factor with the percentage itself. Remember, when we say a quantity increases by 4.9%, you’re actually using the factor
, not
or
. Keeping this distinction clear will save you from making calculation errors in models involving growth!