Question
upstudy study bank question image url

In the following argument, identify the premise and conclusion, explain why the argument is deceptive, and, if possible,
identify the type of fallacy it represents.
Responding to Democrats who support doubling the federal minimum wage, a Republican says, “The Democrats think
that everyone should have the same income.”
The premise is
some Democrats support doubling the federal minimum wage.
Democrats think everyone should have the same income.

Ask by Gross Ellis. in the United States
Jan 23,2025

Upstudy AI Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

Premise: Some Democrats support doubling the federal minimum wage.
Conclusion: Therefore, Democrats think everyone should have the same income.
Deception: The argument misrepresents Democrats’ support for raising the minimum wage as a belief that everyone should have equal income, which oversimplifies their actual views.
Fallacy: Straw Man Fallacy

Solution

Premise and Conclusion:
  • Premise: Some Democrats support doubling the federal minimum wage.
  • Conclusion: Therefore, Democrats think everyone should have the same income.
Explanation of Deception:
The argument is deceptive because it takes a specific policy position (doubling the federal minimum wage) and inaccurately generalizes it to an extreme and unrelated position (believing that everyone should have the same income). This misrepresentation oversimplifies and distorts the actual views of Democrats who support raising the minimum wage, ignoring the nuanced reasons behind their support, such as reducing poverty or increasing workers’ standard of living.
Type of Fallacy:
This argument exemplifies a Straw Man Fallacy. In a straw man fallacy, one party misrepresents or oversimplifies another party’s position to make it easier to attack or dismiss. By claiming that Democrats believe “everyone should have the same income” based solely on their support for increasing the minimum wage, the Republican speaker creates a distorted version of the Democrats’ stance, making it appear more extreme than it actually is.

Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

The Deep Dive

The conclusion is that Democrats think everyone should have the same income, which implies that supporting a higher minimum wage equates to advocating for equal income among all individuals. This argument is deceptive because it oversimplifies the nuanced views of many Democrats, implying an extreme stance that many do not actually hold. Instead of addressing the actual complexities of wage increases, it redirects the argument to an exaggerated interpretation, which is a classic example of a straw man fallacy, where one misrepresents an opponent’s argument to make it easier to attack.

Related Questions

Latest Social Sciences Questions

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy