Question
1) Which of the following would be the best representation for a hypothesis related to puma sport hunting? a. If pumas are hunted, there will be fewer attacks on humans and livestock by pumas. b. If pumas are hunted, then there will be a greater number of deer. c. Both of these are valid hypotheses.
Ask by Perkins Wood. in the United States
Feb 07,2025
Real Tutor Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
Both options are valid hypotheses about puma sport hunting.
Solution
Both options represent testable hypotheses about the effects of puma sport hunting, so the best answer is:
c. Both of these are valid hypotheses.
Explanation:
• Option (a) predicts that puma hunting will lead to fewer attacks on humans and livestock. This hypothesis is measurable because both hunting practices and the incidents of attacks can be quantified.
• Option (b) predicts that puma hunting will result in a greater number of deer, suggesting that removing a predator may affect the population of its prey. This is also measurable through deer population counts and data on hunting practices.
Since both options clearly state a cause-and-effect relationship that can be empirically tested, they are both valid hypotheses related to puma sport hunting.
Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Beyond the Answer
The best representation of a hypothesis related to puma sport hunting is option a, as it explicitly connects the action of hunting pumas to the consequences of reduced attacks on humans and livestock. A hypothesis should ideally reflect a cause-and-effect relationship, which this option showcases quite well, making it a clear statement for testing. On the other hand, option b suggests a connection between puma hunting and the increase in deer populations, which is also interesting but doesn't directly address the primary concern of human-wildlife conflict. For hypothesis testing, clarity and specificity to the issue being addressed are key!
