Question
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
Answer:
Public officials were not paid, so only the wealthy could participate.
Public officials were not paid, so only the wealthy could participate.
Explanation:
During the Pax Romana, political roles were unpaid, making them accessible only to those who could afford to hold office.
During the Pax Romana, political roles were unpaid, making them accessible only to those who could afford to hold office.
Solution
The correct answer is:
Public officials were not paid so only the wealthy could participate.
Explanation:
During the Pax Romana, the political landscape of Rome was dominated by wealthy individuals. One primary reason for this was that public offices were often unpaid positions. Holding a political office required significant personal wealth to cover expenses, campaigns, and maintain a certain social status. As a result, only those with substantial financial resources could afford to participate in governance and politics. This economic barrier effectively restricted political power to the wealthy elite, limiting broader participation from the general populace.
Answer Choice C:
Public officials were not paid so only the wealthy could participate.
Public officials were not paid so only the wealthy could participate.
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Beyond the Answer
Wealthy Romans wielded immense power during the Pax Romana, a period marked by unprecedented peace and prosperity from 27 BC to AD 180. The elite class, particularly the patricians, monopolized political positions and influence, often because of their vast resources and connections. This led to a system where public officials were typically unpaid, making it accessible only to those who could afford to devote their time to governance without compensation. This exclusive club helped maintain the status quo, often neglecting the needs and interests of the broader populace.
If you’re interested in how this historical dynamic has parallels in today’s political structures, look no further than the debates surrounding campaign financing! Just as in ancient Rome, where wealth dictated influence, many modern democracies grapple with the role of money in politics. It raises questions about equity, representation, and the voices of average citizens versus those with deep pockets. Understanding these connections can give a richer perspective on both our past and our present!
