8) A local supermarket spent \( \$ 250,000 \) remodeling. Prior to remodeling, the average daily receipts were \( \$ 57,500 \). In a sample of 18 days following the remodeling, daily receipts were \( \$ 59,800 \) with a standard deviation of \( \$ 5,460 \). At the \( 10 \% \) significance level, what can you conclude as to whether the remodeling improved daily receipts?
Real Tutor Solution
Answer
Solution
Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team
The Deep Dive
To determine if the remodeling improved daily receipts, we can conduct a hypothesis test. Our null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) is that the mean daily receipts after remodeling are the same as before, i.e., \( \mu = 57,500 \). The alternative hypothesis (\( H_a \)) is that the mean daily receipts after remodeling are greater than before, i.e., \( \mu > 57,500 \). We can use a one-sample t-test since we have a sample mean, standard deviation, and the sample size is small (n = 18). We first calculate the t-statistic using the formula: \[ t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{n}} \] Where: - \( \bar{x} = 59,800 \) (sample mean), - \( \mu_0 = 57,500 \) (population mean), - \( s = 5,460 \) (standard deviation), - \( n = 18 \) (sample size). Now, calculating the t-statistic: \[ t = \frac{59,800 - 57,500}{5,460 / \sqrt{18}} = \frac{2,300}{1,290.99} \approx 1.78 \] Next, we compare this t-statistic to the critical value from the t-distribution table for \( df = n - 1 = 17 \) degrees of freedom at a \( 0.10 \) significance level (one-tailed). The critical t-value is approximately \( 1.33 \). Since \( t \approx 1.78 > 1.33 \), we reject the null hypothesis. This suggests that there is statistical evidence at the \( 10\% \) significance level to conclude that the remodeling improved daily receipts. In summary, based on the sample of post-remodel daily receipts, you can confidently say that the remodeling had a positive impact on the supermarket's daily sales! 🎉