Question
Complete the preference table based on the following preference ballot results. The candidates are Parker, Grant, Chavous, Simons, Forcier.
Ask by Deleon Clarke. in the United States
Jan 20,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
| Candidate | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simons | 288 | 0 | 0 | 216 | 254 |
| Parker | 0 | 288 | 216 | 105 | 271 |
| Forcier | 321 | 105 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chavous | 128 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grant | 271 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Solution
Sign in to Unlock Answers for Free!
A Learning Platform Trusted by Millions of Real Students and Teachers.
Unlock Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
Mind Expander
To complete the preference table, we need to aggregate the total number of votes for each candidate based on their rankings from the provided preference ballot results.
Let’s break down the vote counts for each candidate by interpreting the votes from each ballot:
-
Simons, Parker, Forcier, Chavous, Grant: 288 votes
- Simons: 288
- Parker: 288
- Forcier: 288
- Chavous: 288
- Grant: 288
-
Forcier, Chavous, Grant, Simons, Parker: 216 votes
- Forcier: 216
- Chavous: 216
- Grant: 216
- Simons: 216
- Parker: 216
-
Parker, Chavous, Grant, Forcier, Simons: 254 votes
- Parker: 254
- Chavous: 254
- Grant: 254
- Forcier: 254
- Simons: 254
-
Forcier, Parker, Chavous, Simons, Grant: 105 votes
- Forcier: 105
- Parker: 105
- Chavous: 105
- Simons: 105
- Grant: 105
-
Grant, Parker, Chavous, Simons, Forcier: 271 votes
- Grant: 271
- Parker: 271
- Chavous: 271
- Simons: 271
- Forcier: 271
-
Chavous, Grant, Parker, Simons, Forcier: 128 votes
- Chavous: 128
- Grant: 128
- Parker: 128
- Simons: 128
- Forcier: 128
Now we can aggregate the total votes for each candidate:
-
Parker:
- 288 (1st position)
- 216 (3rd position)
- 254 (1st position)
- 105 (2nd position)
- 271 (2nd position)
- 128 (3rd position)
- Total for Parker = 288 + 216 + 254 + 105 + 271 + 128 = 1262
-
Grant:
- 288 (5th position)
- 216 (4th position)
- 254 (3rd position)
- 105 (5th position)
- 271 (1st position)
- 128 (2nd position)
- Total for Grant = 288 + 216 + 254 + 105 + 271 + 128 = 1262
-
Chavous:
- 288 (4th position)
- 216 (1st position)
- 254 (2nd position)
- 105 (3rd position)
- 271 (3rd position)
- 128 (1st position)
- Total for Chavous = 288 + 216 + 254 + 105 + 271 + 128 = 1262
-
Simons:
- 288 (2nd position)
- 216 (5th position)
- 254 (4th position)
- 105 (4th position)
- 271 (4th position)
- 128 (4th position)
- Total for Simons = 288 + 216 + 254 + 105 + 271 + 128 = 1262
-
Forcier:
- 288 (3rd position)
- 216 (2nd position)
- 254 (last position)
- 105 (1st position)
- 271 (last position)
- 128 (last position)
- Total for Forcier = 288 + 216 + 254 + 105 + 271 + 128 = 1262
By assessing the totals neatly, we conclude:
- Parker: 1262
- Grant: 1262
- Chavous: 1262
- Simons: 1262
- Forcier: 1262
Thus, based on the mean rankings, all candidates are tied with 1262 votes each.
