Which of the following are fallacies? Describe how each choice is deceptive. Select all that apply. $$ \square $$ A. I placed the quartz crystal on my forehead, and in five minutes my headache was gone. The crystal made my headache go away. This argument is deceptive because it claims that because one thing happened before another, the first event caused the second event, but it doesn't prove that there is any connection between the two events. $$ \square $$ B. The patient is still breathing. He must be still alive. This argument is deceptive because it makes a generalization about people who are breathing. The premise has nothing to do with being alive. $$ \square $$ C. Company A makes the best pickup trucks in the world. More people drive Company A pickups than any other light truck. This argument is deceptive because the fact that a large number of people buy Company A pickup trucks does not necessarily mean that they are the best trucks. D. Society has an obligation to provide health insurance because health care is a right of citizenship. This argument is deceptive because the premise and conclusion essentially say the same ithing

Question

UpStudy AI · Accepted Answer

Let's analyze each choice to determine whether they represent fallacies and describe how each is deceptive.

### A. 
**Statement:** I placed the quartz crystal on my forehead, and in five minutes my headache was gone. The crystal made my headache go away.  
**Deceptive Aspect:** This argument commits the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, which assumes that because one event (placing the crystal) occurred before another event (the headache going away), the first event caused the second. It fails to provide evidence of a causal relationship and ignores other possible explanations for the headache's resolution, such as time, other treatments, or natural recovery.

### B. 
**Statement:** The patient is still breathing. He must be still alive.  
**Deceptive Aspect:** This argument is an example of a hasty generalization. While breathing is typically associated with being alive, it is not a definitive indicator. There are instances where individuals may exhibit breathing-like functions without being alive (e.g., certain medical conditions). The argument oversimplifies the relationship between breathing and life, leading to a misleading conclusion.

### C. 
**Statement:** Company A makes the best pickup trucks in the world. More people drive Company A pickups than any other light truck.  
**Deceptive Aspect:** This argument is an example of the appeal to popularity fallacy (argumentum ad populum). Just because a large number of people choose to drive Company A pickups does not inherently mean they are the best. Popularity can be influenced by various factors such as marketing, availability, or brand loyalty, rather than the actual quality of the trucks.

### D. 
**Statement:** Society has an obligation to provide health insurance because health care is a right of citizenship.  
**Deceptive Aspect:** This argument may be seen as circular reasoning (begging the question). It assumes that health care is a right without providing justification for that claim. The premise and conclusion essentially restate the same idea without offering additional support or evidence, making the argument unconvincing.

### Conclusion
The fallacies present in the statements are:
- **A** (post hoc ergo propter hoc)
- **B** (hasty generalization)
- **C** (appeal to popularity)
- **D** (circular reasoning)

Thus, all options A, B, C, and D are fallacies.
All options A, B, C, and D are fallacies because: - **A** assumes the crystal caused the headache to go away without proof. - **B** generalizes that breathing means being alive, which isn't always true. - **C** claims Company A trucks are the best based solely on popularity. - **D** restates the same idea without providing evidence. Therefore, all choices are deceptive.

Real Tutor Solution

Answer

Solution

Extra Insights

Related Questions

Latest Social Sciences Questions