Translate the second technical text from your lesson, the Statement of JUSTICE STEVENS, Into ordinary Engllsh usin he steps provied In your lesson. First, define any unfamillar words. Then, write your paraphrase. Your answer shou include your llst of definillons, followed by your summary. \( \begin{array}{l}\text { Statement of JUSTICE STEVENS respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari. The limitations period in } \\ \text { the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of } 1996 \text { (AEDPA) requires a person in custody pursuant to the } \\ \text { judgment of a State court to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus within one year of the date on which the } \\ \text { judgment became final ...." } 28 \text { U. S. C. } 2244 \text { (d)(1)(A). This case raises the question whether a Texas order of } \\ \text { deferred adjudication probation is a judgment under the statute. In essence, a deferred adjudication probation } \\ \text { order places a defendant on probation while postponing any adjudication of guilt. ... }\end{array} \)
Real Tutor Solution
Answer
Solution
Sign in to Unlock Answers for Free!
A Learning Platform Trusted by Millions of Real Students and Teachers.
Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team
Mind Expander
First, let’s break down the unfamiliar words and phrases: 1. **Writ of certiorari**: An order by a higher court to review the decision of a lower court. 2. **Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA)**: A legislative act aimed at increasing penalties for terrorism and streamlining the death penalty process, including limitations on filing appeals. 3. **Habeas corpus**: A legal procedure to challenge unlawful detention or imprisonment. 4. **Deferred adjudication probation**: A type of probation where a defendant's guilt is not formally decided, but they agree to certain terms instead. Now, here's the paraphrase: Justice Stevens discusses a legal decision about the time limits imposed by a 1996 law, which states that people imprisoned because of a state court’s decision must request to challenge their imprisonment (through a habeas corpus petition) within one year after the court’s ruling becomes final. This particular case is focused on whether a specific type of probation in Texas, called deferred adjudication probation, counts as a legal judgment under this law. This probation allows someone to avoid a formal finding of guilt while still being under supervised conditions.