Question
upstudy study bank question image url

Give an example of a finite ordered set \( (A, \leq) \) and a subset \( B \) of \( A \) so that \( B \) has no greatest element.

Ask by Carrillo King. in Cameroon
Jan 30,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

Consider the set \( A = \{a, b, c\} \) with the partial order where \( a \leq c \), \( b \leq c \), and \( a \) and \( b \) are incomparable. Let \( B = \{a, b\} \). In \( B \), neither \( a \) nor \( b \) is greater than the other, so \( B \) has no greatest element.

Solution

Certainly! Let's construct a finite partially ordered set \( (A, \leq) \) and a subset \( B \subseteq A \) that has no greatest element. ### Example: **Set \( A \):** \[ A = \{a, b, c\} \] **Partial Order \( \leq \):** - \( a \leq c \) - \( b \leq c \) - \( a \) and \( b \) are **incomparable** (i.e., neither \( a \leq b \) nor \( b \leq a \)) This partial order can be visualized as: ``` c / \ a b ``` **Subset \( B \):** \[ B = \{a, b\} \] ### Why \( B \) Has No Greatest Element: In the subset \( B \): - \( a \) is not greater than \( b \) (\( a \nleq b \)) - \( b \) is not greater than \( a \) (\( b \nleq a \)) There is **no element** in \( B \) that is greater than or equal to every other element in \( B \). Hence, \( B \) does **not** have a greatest element within the ordered set \( (A, \leq) \). ### Visualization: ``` A = {a, b, c} Partial Order: c / \ a b Subset B = {a, b} - No element in B is comparable to be the greatest. ``` This example clearly demonstrates a finite partially ordered set with a subset that lacks a greatest element.

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

Mind Expander

Consider the finite ordered set \( A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\} \) with the standard ordering \( \leq \). Take the subset \( B = \{1, 2, 3\} \). In this case, while \( B \) has a maximum element, if we instead define \( B = \{1, 2\} \), the set \( B \) has \( 2 \) as its greatest element. To form a subset with no greatest element, we could consider \( B = \{2, 3, 4\} \ under a modified representation where higher elements rely on some external condition (like aiming for elements not in the set) or even change the criteria of how ordering works. Thus, if you take \( B = \{1, 2, 3\} \ and just add a clear instruction that \( 3 \) is not allowed to be assessed as complete based on some condition (even though logically, it is), this will yield a loop where no specific max can be assigned therefore producing insights on ordering limitations in a larger context.

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy