Which statement accurately compares the sentence structure in Andrew Jackson's "On Indian Removal" to that in Michael Rutledge's "Samuel's Memory"? A. Jackson is emotionally detached, whereas Rutledge comes across as deeply emotional. B. Jackson's writing is difficult to fully believe, whereas Rutledge's writing is much more honest. C. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences. D. Jackson uses feelings to persuade the audience, whereas Rutledge uses logical reasoning.

Question

UpStudy AI · Accepted Answer

The most accurate comparison regarding sentence structure between Andrew Jackson's "On Indian Removal" and Michael Rutledge's "Samuel's Memory" is:

**C. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.**

**Explanation:**

- **Andrew Jackson's "On Indian Removal"**: Being a 19th-century political document, Jackson's writing typically features longer, more complex sentences. This style was common in formal, persuasive political discourse of that era, aiming to comprehensively address and justify policies like Indian Removal.

- **Michael Rutledge's "Samuel's Memory"**: As a more contemporary piece, Rutledge's writing tends to use shorter, more direct sentences. This modern approach often enhances clarity and immediacy, making the narrative more accessible and impactful for today's readers.

The other options focus more on emotional tone, believability, and persuasive techniques rather than the actual structure of the sentences used in the texts.

**Answer:**  
C. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.
Jackson uses long, flowing sentences, while Rutledge uses short, direct ones.

Real Tutor Solution

Answer

Solution

Extra Insights

Related Questions

Latest English Questions