Question
upstudy study bank question image url

Helght and Weight Using the data in the Studentsurvey dataset containing the students' weight and height, we use technology to find that a regression line to predict weight (in pounds) From height (in inches) is \[ \text { Weight e }=170+4 . H 2 \text { (Ileinhi) } \] Click here for the dataset associated with this question. (d) Wilat weight does the regression line predict for a baby who is 20 inches long? Round your answer to one decimal place. \[ \text { Weight }= \] \( \square \) \( \square \) pounds Why is it not appropriate to use the regression line in this case? It is because \( \square \) (Ctif) *

Ask by Reed Wyatt. in the United States
Feb 03,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

Predicted weight for a 20-inch baby is 1770.0 pounds. It's not appropriate to use the regression line because the model was created with data from older individuals, not infants.

Solution

To solve the problem, we will follow these steps: 1. **Extract the known conditions**: - The regression line equation is given as: \[ \text{Weight} = 170 + 4H^2 \] - We need to predict the weight for a height \( H = 20 \) inches. 2. **Substitute the height into the regression equation**: - We will substitute \( H = 20 \) into the equation to find the predicted weight. 3. **Calculate the predicted weight**: - The calculation will be done step by step. Let's perform the substitution and calculation: \[ \text{Weight} = 170 + 4(20^2) \] Calculating \( 20^2 \): \[ 20^2 = 400 \] Now substituting back into the equation: \[ \text{Weight} = 170 + 4(400) \] Calculating \( 4(400) \): \[ 4(400) = 1600 \] Now, adding this to 170: \[ \text{Weight} = 170 + 1600 = 1770 \] Thus, the predicted weight for a baby who is 20 inches long is: \[ \text{Weight} = 1770 \text{ pounds} \] Now, rounding to one decimal place, we have: \[ \text{Weight} = 1770.0 \text{ pounds} \] ### Why is it not appropriate to use the regression line in this case? It is not appropriate to use the regression line for a baby who is 20 inches long because: - The regression model is likely based on data from older children or adults, and using it to predict the weight of a baby falls outside the range of the data used to create the model. This can lead to inaccurate predictions, as the relationship between height and weight may not hold for infants. Thus, the final answers are: \[ \text{Weight} = 1770.0 \text{ pounds} \] And the reason is: It is because **the regression model is not valid for predicting weights of infants, as it is based on data from older individuals.**

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

The Deep Dive

To predict the weight for a baby who is 20 inches long, you would plug \( H = 20 \) into the regression equation: \[ \text{Weight} = 170 + 4 \cdot 20 = 170 + 80 = 250 \text{ pounds} \] So, \( \text{Weight} = 250.0 \) pounds. It is not appropriate to use the regression line in this case because the model is likely based on data for older children or adults, and using it to predict the weight of a baby could lead to unrealistic and erroneous results, as infants' growth patterns and body composition differ significantly from those of older children and adults.

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy