Question
upstudy study bank question image url

Iteght and Wight Using the data in the Studentsurvey dataset containing the students' weight and helght, we use techoogy to find that a regressic line to predict weight (in pounde) from height (in inches) is \[ \text { HWight }==170+4 . B 2(H \text { light }) \] Click here for the dataset associated with this questions (d) What weight does the regression line predict for a baby who is 20 inches long? Round your answer to one decimal place. \[ \text { Weight }= \] \( \square \) pounds Why is it not appropriate to use the regression line in this case? It is because \( \square \)

Ask by Henry Christensen. in the United States
Feb 03,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

Predicted weight for a 20-inch baby is 254.0 pounds. It's not appropriate to use the regression line because the baby's height of 20 inches is outside the range of heights in the original dataset.

Solution

To determine the predicted weight for a baby who is 20 inches long using the given regression line: \[ \text{Weight} = 170 + 4.2 \times \text{Height} \] **Calculation:** \[ \text{Weight} = 170 + 4.2 \times 20 = 170 + 84 = 254.0 \text{ pounds} \] \[ \boxed{254.0} \text{ pounds} \] **Why is it not appropriate to use the regression line in this case?** It is because **20 inches is outside the range of heights in the dataset used to create the regression model**. Using the regression line to predict values outside the range of the original data (a process known as extrapolation) can lead to unreliable and inaccurate predictions. The model was developed based on the heights and weights of students, and a 20-inch height for a baby is not representative of the data used to create the regression equation.

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

Beyond the Answer

To predict the weight of a baby who is 20 inches long using the regression line equation \( \text{Weight} = 170 + 4.2(\text{Height}) \), simply substitute 20 for Height. \[ \text{Weight} = 170 + 4.2(20) = 170 + 84 = 254.0 \text{ pounds} \] However, using this regression line isn't appropriate here because it was likely developed based on data from a different population, such as older children or adults, and thus may not apply to babies. Babies typically weigh significantly less than the prediction suggests, highlighting the importance of proper model application and consideration of the data's context.

Related Questions

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy