Question
According to our article on Luddite teens in this week’s reading, one of the criticisms
leveled at this group was
Their actions were racist
Their actions were classist.
Their actions were opposed by tech workers.
Their actions were unrealistic
leveled at this group was
Their actions were racist
Their actions were classist.
Their actions were opposed by tech workers.
Their actions were unrealistic
Ask by Knight Franklin. in the United States
Mar 23,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
The article criticizes Luddite teens for their unrealistic actions.
Solution
To analyze the criticisms leveled at Luddite teens based on the provided options, let’s break down each statement:
-
Their actions were racist: This would imply that the Luddite teens’ actions discriminated against a particular race or ethnicity. Without specific context from the article, it’s hard to determine if this criticism is valid.
-
Their actions were classist: This suggests that the actions of the Luddite teens favored one social class over another, potentially alienating those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Again, context from the article would be needed to assess this claim.
-
Their actions were opposed by tech workers: This indicates that individuals working in the technology sector disagreed with the Luddite teens’ actions. This could be a significant criticism if tech workers viewed the teens as hindering progress.
-
Their actions were unrealistic: This criticism suggests that the goals or methods of the Luddite teens were impractical or unattainable. This is a common critique of movements that resist technological advancement.
To determine which criticism is most relevant, one would need to refer to the specific arguments and evidence presented in the article. If you have more context or details from the article, I can help analyze which criticism is most supported.
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Beyond the Answer
One of the core criticisms directed at Luddite teens revolves around their perceived unrealistic approach to technology. Critics argue that completely rejecting modern advancements doesn’t consider the benefits and conveniences they bring to daily life. The challenge lies in finding a balance between embracing technology and being mindful of its social implications.
Additionally, another significant point of contention is the classist undertones of the Luddite movement. Some believe that this rejection of technology is more reflective of privilege, allowing those already in stable positions to opt-out, while marginalized communities often rely on technology for basic needs and opportunities. Recognizing this dynamic highlights the complex relationship between technology and social equity.
