The youngest person in a company is 29. The oldest is 69. a. What is the range? b. Is the range a good measure of spread for the ages in the company? Why or why not? a. The range is

a. **The range is 40 years.** *Calculation:* Range = Oldest age - Youngest age Range = 69 years - 29 years Range = 40 years b. **The range is not the best measure of spread for the ages in the company.** *Explanation:* While the range provides a quick snapshot of the spread by showing the difference between the youngest and oldest ages, it has several limitations: 1. **Sensitivity to Outliers:** The range only considers the two extreme values. If there's an unusually young or old employee that isn't representative of the overall age distribution, the range can be misleading. 2. **Lack of Detail:** It doesn't provide any information about how the other employees' ages are distributed between the youngest and oldest. For instance, the majority of employees might be clustered around the average age, but the range wouldn't reflect this concentration. 3. **Doesn't Reflect Variability:** Other measures like the interquartile range or standard deviation offer a better understanding of the data's variability by considering more data points. Therefore, while the range offers a basic idea of the spread, using additional statistical measures would provide a more comprehensive view of the age distribution within the company.