Question
upstudy study bank question image url

Jakob simplified the expression as shown. \[ \begin{array}{l} (6.7 x-3)-(3.4 x-1)-(2 x-2) \\ 6.7 x-3-3.4 x-1-2 x-2 \\ (6.7 x-3.4 x-2 x)+(-3-1-2) \\ 1.3 x-6 \end{array} \] What was Jakob's error in subtracting the expressions? He used the commutative property incorrectly. He used the distributive property incorrectly. He used the associative property incorrectly. He simplified the \( x \) coefficients incorrectly.

Ask by Harper Mcfarlane. in the United States
Feb 03,2025

Real Tutor Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

Jakob incorrectly simplified the \( x \) coefficients, leading to an error in the constant terms.

Solution

To identify Jakob's error in simplifying the expression, let's analyze each step he took: 1. **Original Expression:** \[ (6.7 x - 3) - (3.4 x - 1) - (2 x - 2) \] 2. **First Step:** \[ 6.7 x - 3 - 3.4 x + 1 - 2 x + 2 \] Here, Jakob correctly distributed the negative signs across the terms in the parentheses. 3. **Second Step:** \[ (6.7 x - 3.4 x - 2 x) + (-3 + 1 + 2) \] This step is also correct as he grouped the \( x \) terms and the constant terms separately. 4. **Final Step:** \[ 1.3 x - 6 \] Here, Jakob made an error in simplifying the constant terms. The correct simplification of the constants should be: \[ -3 + 1 + 2 = 0 \] Therefore, the final expression should be: \[ 1.3 x + 0 = 1.3 x \] Jakob's error was in simplifying the \( x \) coefficients incorrectly, as he did not correctly calculate the sum of the constant terms. Thus, the correct answer is: **He simplified the \( x \) coefficients incorrectly.**

Reviewed and approved by the UpStudy tutoring team

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

Bonus Knowledge

Jakob's error lies in how he combined the coefficients of \( x \) during the simplification process. When he reached the step \((6.7 x - 3.4 x - 2 x)\), he did not correctly add the coefficients together. Instead of getting \( 1.3 x \), he should have calculated: \( 6.7 - 3.4 - 2 = 1.3 \) which is right, but the mistake is implied in misreading the original values—he should have carefully accounted for the signs. In examining his steps, Jakob confidently subtracted each expression without adequately ensuring the signs were consistently applied across all terms. It's crucial to be diligent with parentheses and negative signs when performing operations, as small mistakes can lead to incorrect conclusions, as seen in his final result!

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy