Pregunta
upstudy study bank question image url

Jakob simplified the expression as shown. \[ \begin{array}{l} (6.7 x-3)-(3.4 x-1)-(2 x-2) \\ 6.7 x-3-3.4 x-1-2 x-2 \\ (6.7 x-3.4 x-2 x)+(-3-1-2) \\ 1.3 x-6 \end{array} \] What was Jakob's error in subtracting the expressions? He used the commutative property incorrectly. He used the distributive property incorrectly. He used the associative property incorrectly. He simplified the \( x \) coefficients incorrectly.

Ask by Harper Mcfarlane. in the United States
Feb 03,2025

Solución de tutoría real

Respuesta verificada por el tutor

Responder

Jakob incorrectly simplified the \( x \) coefficients, leading to an error in the constant terms.

Solución

To identify Jakob's error in simplifying the expression, let's analyze each step he took: 1. **Original Expression:** \[ (6.7 x - 3) - (3.4 x - 1) - (2 x - 2) \] 2. **First Step:** \[ 6.7 x - 3 - 3.4 x + 1 - 2 x + 2 \] Here, Jakob correctly distributed the negative signs across the terms in the parentheses. 3. **Second Step:** \[ (6.7 x - 3.4 x - 2 x) + (-3 + 1 + 2) \] This step is also correct as he grouped the \( x \) terms and the constant terms separately. 4. **Final Step:** \[ 1.3 x - 6 \] Here, Jakob made an error in simplifying the constant terms. The correct simplification of the constants should be: \[ -3 + 1 + 2 = 0 \] Therefore, the final expression should be: \[ 1.3 x + 0 = 1.3 x \] Jakob's error was in simplifying the \( x \) coefficients incorrectly, as he did not correctly calculate the sum of the constant terms. Thus, the correct answer is: **He simplified the \( x \) coefficients incorrectly.**

Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy

error msg
Explicar
Simplifique esta solución

Bonus Knowledge

Jakob's error lies in how he combined the coefficients of \( x \) during the simplification process. When he reached the step \((6.7 x - 3.4 x - 2 x)\), he did not correctly add the coefficients together. Instead of getting \( 1.3 x \), he should have calculated: \( 6.7 - 3.4 - 2 = 1.3 \) which is right, but the mistake is implied in misreading the original values—he should have carefully accounted for the signs. In examining his steps, Jakob confidently subtracted each expression without adequately ensuring the signs were consistently applied across all terms. It's crucial to be diligent with parentheses and negative signs when performing operations, as small mistakes can lead to incorrect conclusions, as seen in his final result!

¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde Hazte Premium
Estudiar puede ser una verdadera lucha
¿Por qué no estudiarlo en UpStudy?
Seleccione su plan a continuación
Prima

Puedes disfrutar

Empieza ahora
  • Explicaciones paso a paso
  • Tutores expertos en vivo 24/7
  • Número ilimitado de preguntas
  • Sin interrupciones
  • Acceso completo a Respuesta y Solución
  • Acceso completo al chat de PDF, al chat de UpStudy y al chat de navegación
Básico

Totalmente gratis pero limitado

  • Solución limitada
Bienvenido a ¡Estudia ahora!
Inicie sesión para continuar con el recorrido de Thoth AI Chat
Continuar con correo electrónico
O continuar con
Al hacer clic en "Iniciar sesión", acepta nuestros términos y condiciones. Términos de Uso & Política de privacidad