Question
Which of the following is NOT a typical negative consequence of compensation as a social strategy for coping with
prejudice and discrimination when interacting with another person?
increased feelings that one is not being authentic
disrupted smooth flow of interaction
cognitive exhaustion
negative partner impressions of oneself
prejudice and discrimination when interacting with another person?
increased feelings that one is not being authentic
disrupted smooth flow of interaction
cognitive exhaustion
negative partner impressions of oneself
Ask by Barnett Harrington. in the United States
Mar 30,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
Negative partner impressions of oneself is not a typical negative consequence of compensation as a social strategy for coping with prejudice and discrimination.
Solution
-
Identify the Strategy and Its Typical CostsWhen individuals use compensation as a social strategy for coping with prejudice and discrimination, they tend to:
- Act in ways that “compensate” for the negative stereotypes or prejudiced expectations.
- Frequently monitor their behavior, which can lead to feelings of inauthenticity.
- Experience cognitive exhaustion from the mental effort of self‐monitoring.
- Have interactions that may feel less smooth because of the extra self-regulation involved.
-
Match the Given Options to These ConsequencesThe options provided are:
-
Increased feelings that one is not being authentic:
This is a well-documented intrapersonal cost of self-monitoring and compensation. -
Disrupted smooth flow of interaction:
The extra attention required for compensation can interrupt the natural dynamics of conversation. -
Cognitive exhaustion:
Constant self-regulation and vigilance can deplete cognitive resources. -
Negative partner impressions of oneself:
Although compensation can affect interactions, most of the negative effects tend to be intrapersonal (feeling inauthentic, cognitively taxed) or affect the interaction dynamics (smooth flow) rather than lead directly to the partner forming negative judgments about the person who compensates.
-
-
ConclusionBased on the literature, the negative consequences of compensation are mostly about the individual’s internal experience and the quality of interaction, rather than consistently leading to negative impressions by the partner. Therefore, the option that is NOT a typical negative consequence is:
.
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Bonus Knowledge
When it comes to dealing with prejudice and discrimination, individuals often resort to compensation strategies to manage their interactions. Surprisingly, one consequence that isn’t typical is the development of negative partner impressions of oneself. Often, the goal of compensation is to maintain positive connections, so the focus is more on managing perceptions rather than inadvertently creating negative impressions.
Another intriguing aspect of compensation strategies is that they can lead to cognitive exhaustion. This happens when people work hard to adapt their behavior, worrying about how they are perceived by others, which can drain mental resources. It’s like performing a high-wire act without a safety net—intensely focused but exhausting in the long run!
