In the following passage, a boy in ancient Egypt daydreams about what might happen to a block of gold. Select the best evidence to support the statement that only Zau the Master is allowed to make gold objects for the Pharaoh. It might become part of a wide and glittering collar, or the inlay on a fine dagger for some nobleman's tomb-or better, a cup fit for Pharaoh himself, shaped like a flower and hammered to fragile thinness... . . Such a cup as he had pictured could never come from this particular goldhountse. No one here had the skill to fashion it.. . .Zau the Master could make anything. From his artist's fingers sprang objects of such wonderful beauty-cups, bowls, boxes, necklaces, daggers, great golden collars, bracelets, exquisite amulets-that Pharaoh himself would be served by no other smith. To think I might have been his pupil someday, if my father had lived, Ranofer thought.
Solución de tutoría real
Responder
Solución
Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy
Explicar 
Simplifique esta solución Bonus Knowledge
The passage indicates that Zau the Master is the only one with the unique skill required to create exquisite items for Pharaoh, stating, "Zau the Master could make anything. From his artist's fingers sprang objects of such wonderful beauty." This highlights Zau's unparalleled craftsmanship, implying that no other goldsmith possesses the same abilities necessary to create the objects that the Pharaoh would accept. Furthermore, the text emphasizes that "Pharaoh himself would be served by no other smith," directly supporting the idea that Zau holds exclusive rights to make gold items for the Pharaoh. This further cements Zau’s unique position in the hierarchy of craftsmen in ancient Egypt and his importance in fulfilling the Pharaoh's demands for intricate metalwork.
