First, we need to rewrite these equations in standard form .
Rearranging Equation (1):
Rearranging Equation (2):
Now we have the system:
Cramer’s Rule states that for a system of equations , the solution for each variable can be found using determinants.
Let:
Step 1: Calculate the determinant of :
Step 2: Calculate :
Step 3: Calculate (replace the first column of with ):
Step 4: Calculate :
Step 5: Calculate (replace the second column of with ):
Step 6: Calculate :
Step 7: Solve for and :
Now, let’s calculate these values:
1.2 Determine the minor and cofactor
Given the determinant:
1.2.1 Minor of 6:
The minor of an element is the determinant of the matrix that remains after removing the row and column of that element.
To find the minor of 6, we remove the third row and third column:
Calculating the determinant:
Calculating :
1.2.2 Cofactor of -5:
The cofactor is given by , where and are the row and column indices of the element.
For -5 (located at row 2, column 3):
To find , we remove the second row and third column:
Calculating the determinant:
Thus,
1.3 Solve for using Cramer’s Rule
Given the equations:
[
2x - 7z = 5y + 14 \quad (7
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
Como
error msg
Explicar
Simplifique esta solución
Mind Expander
Did you know that Cramer’s Rule, which you’re employing in this assignment, is named after Gabriel Cramer, an 18th-century Swiss mathematician? He introduced this nifty method in the context of linear algebra for solving systems of linear equations using determinants. It’s remarkable how mathematical concepts from centuries ago still hold relevance in our modern problem-solving toolkit!
In practical applications, Cramer’s Rule can be a game changer! Engineers and scientists often solve systems of equations to model real-world scenarios—whether determining forces in a structure or optimizing resource allocation in projects. However, for larger systems, alternative methods like matrix operations or numerical solutions might be more efficient, as Cramer’s Rule can become computationally intensive with bigger matrices. Fun, right?