Pregunta
Which of the following will not change the file-position pointer to
the same position as the others? Assume a 10-byte file size and a
current position at byte # 1 ,
fileObject.seekg(2, ios::beg);
fileObject.seekg(2);
fileObject.seekg(1, ios::cur);
the same position as the others? Assume a 10-byte file size and a
current position at byte # 1 ,
fileObject.seekg(2, ios::beg);
fileObject.seekg(2);
fileObject.seekg(1, ios::cur);
Ask by Spencer Thornton. in the United States
Mar 28,2025
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Respuesta verificada por el tutor
Responder
All three calls move the file-position pointer to byte .
Solución

¡Inicia sesión para desbloquear respuestas gratis!
Una plataforma de aprendizaje en la que confían millones de estudiantes y profesores reales.

Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
Como
Bonus Knowledge
The file-position pointer will not be changed to the same position by
fileObject.seekg(1, ios::cur);
. Since the current position is at byte #1, moving 1 byte forward using the ios::cur
option will result in a new position at byte #2, while the other two seek functions move the pointer to byte #2 directly from the beginning.To visualize:
seekg(2, ios::beg)
moves to byte #2, and so does seekg(2)
, but seekg(1, ios::cur)
moves to byte #2 from the current byte #1. All positions match here, but when you think about more complex movements, using offsets from ios::cur
can lead to confusion in larger files!
¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde
Hazte Premium