Which allows the researcher to claim causation between an explanatory variable and a response variable? $$ \begin{array}{l} ext { allows the researcher to claim causation between an explanatory variable and a response variable }\end{array} $$

Question

Which allows the researcher to claim causation between an explanatory variable and a response variable? $$ \begin{array}{l}	ext { allows the researcher to claim causation between an explanatory variable and a response variable }\end{array} $$

UpStudy AI · Accepted Answer

To establish a **causal relationship** between an explanatory variable (independent variable) and a response variable (dependent variable), researchers typically rely on **randomized controlled experiments**. Here's why:

### **Randomized Controlled Experiments (RCTs)**

1. **Randomization**:
   - Participants are randomly assigned to different groups (e.g., treatment vs. control).
   - This process helps ensure that **confounding variables** (external factors that could influence the outcome) are evenly distributed across groups, minimizing their impact.

2. **Control**:
   - Researchers control the environment and the variables being tested.
   - By manipulating only the explanatory variable and keeping other factors constant, it's easier to attribute any observed effect directly to the explanatory variable.

3. **Replication**:
   - Experiments can be repeated to verify results, increasing the reliability of the findings.

4. **Blinding**:
   - Techniques like single-blind or double-blind studies prevent bias from both participants and researchers, ensuring that the results are due to the intervention itself and not expectations.

### **Why Not Observational Studies?**

While **observational studies** (where researchers observe without manipulating variables) can identify associations between variables, they **cannot definitively establish causation**. This limitation arises because it's challenging to account for all possible confounding variables that might influence the relationship.

### **Conclusion**

To confidently claim causation between variables, **randomized controlled experiments** are the gold standard in research methodology. They provide the necessary control and randomization to isolate the effect of the explanatory variable on the response variable.

**Reference:**
- *Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer* by Judea Pearl et al.
- *Design and Analysis of Experiments* by Douglas C. Montgomery

**Summary:** Conducting a randomized controlled experiment, where the explanatory variable is actively manipulated and confounding factors are controlled, allows researchers to claim a causal relationship between the explanatory and response variables.
To claim causation between an explanatory variable and a response variable, researchers should use **randomized controlled experiments**. This method ensures that the effect observed is due to the explanatory variable by controlling for other factors and randomly assigning participants to different groups.

Which allows the researcher to claim causation between an explanatory variable and a response variable?

Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy

Responder

Solución

Extra Insights

preguntas relacionadas

Latest Statistics Questions