Which of the following conclusions do the results of the model best support? A. Larvae populations in large bodies of water with at least 16 cubic km would not be affected if pollution levels are limited to \( 1 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L} \). B. Across all locations, larvae populations decrease by 2000 for each increase of \( 0.5 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L} \) of pollution levels. C. Larvae populations in smaller bodies of water are more affected by pollution than those in larger bodies of water. D. Across all locations, if any level of pollution is sustained for several years, the larvae populations will be eliminated.
Solución de tutoría real
Responder
Solución
Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy
![](/pmw/light_bulb.png?etag=525fd69ac661e11754e2fc9f1b18a4ee)
![](/pmw/spiral_notepad.png?etag=abe3906b7558c543a7b30ba53a3b5a5b)
Mind Expander
The conclusions drawn from models like these often hinge on statistical correlations and observed trends. In this case, the model might best support conclusion C, indicating that larvae populations in smaller bodies of water are more affected by pollution. This could reflect the idea that limited water volume in smaller bodies leads to a higher concentration of pollutants and less dilution capacity, causing more significant biological stress. Furthermore, understanding these dynamics is crucial because they inform environmental policies and conservation strategies. For instance, if smaller ecosystems are notably vulnerable, then efforts to manage pollution must prioritize these areas to maintain ecological balance and species diversity. Protecting these smaller habitats could have a profound ecological ripple effect!
![](/pmw/img-try-permium.webp)