9. Mickey D's In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald's had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders observed (based on data from \( Q S R \) magazine). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the rate of inaccurate orders is equal to \( 10 \% \). Does the accuracy rate appear to be acceptable?
Solución de tutoría real
Responder
Solución
Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy
Extra Insights
To test the claim, we start by setting up our hypotheses: - Null Hypothesis (\( H_0 \)): The rate of inaccurate orders is \( 10\% \) (or \( p = 0.10 \)). - Alternative Hypothesis (\( H_a \)): The rate of inaccurate orders is not \( 10\% \) (or \( p \neq 0.10 \)). The sample proportion of inaccurate orders from the observed data is calculated as: \[ \hat{p} = \frac{33}{362} \approx 0.0912 \] Next, we can use a z-test for proportions. The test statistic is calculated using the formula: \[ z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1 - p_0)}{n}}} \] where \( p_0 = 0.10 \) and \( n = 362 \). Plugging in the numbers: \[ z = \frac{0.0912 - 0.10}{\sqrt{\frac{0.10(0.90)}{362}}} \approx \frac{-0.0088}{0.025} \approx -0.35 \] Now, we look for the critical z-value for a two-tailed test at a 0.05 significance level, which is approximately ±1.96. Since our calculated z-value (-0.35) lies between -1.96 and 1.96, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Based on this test, there is not enough evidence to claim that the rate of inaccurate orders is significantly different from \( 10\% \). Thus, it appears that the accuracy rate could be considered acceptable, as it does not significantly deviate from the \( 10\% \) standard.