Pregunta
upstudy study bank question image url

Click Clear and then Run 10 trials 10 more times so that there are 100 trials. 1. How many of the outcomes are favorable? 2. What is the probability of landing on a 1 now? \( 1 / 100 \) I for the fraction bar. Please do not reduce on this problem.) 3. Compare the experimental probability with the theoretical probability of \( P(x=1)=\frac{1}{3} \). Do you think an experiment with 100 trials produces a probability is more reliable than an experiment with 10 trials? Yes \( \leftarrow \) (Click to view explanation) Check

Ask by Bowman Lynch. in the United States
Feb 03,2025

Solución de tutoría real

Respuesta verificada por el tutor

Responder

**1. Favorable Outcomes:** 1 **2. Probability of Landing on a 1:** \(\frac{1}{100}\) **3. Comparison:** Yes, 100 trials provide a more reliable probability estimate than 10 trials.

Solución

Sure, let's address each of your questions step by step: --- ### **1. How many of the outcomes are favorable?** **Answer:** **1** **Explanation:** In your experiment, out of 100 trials, you observed the outcome you're interested in (landing on a 1) **1** time. Therefore, the number of favorable outcomes is **1**. --- ### **2. What is the probability of landing on a 1 now?** \(\frac{1}{100}\) *(Displayed as a fraction bar without reducing)* **Answer:** \[ \frac{1}{100} \] **Explanation:** Probability is calculated as the number of favorable outcomes divided by the total number of trials. Here, that's: \[ \text{Probability} = \frac{\text{Number of Favorable Outcomes}}{\text{Total Number of Trials}} = \frac{1}{100} \] You correctly represented the probability as \(\frac{1}{100}\). --- ### **3. Compare the experimental probability with the theoretical probability of \( P(x=1)=\frac{1}{3} \). Do you think an experiment with 100 trials produces a probability that is more reliable than an experiment with 10 trials?** **Your Answer:** **Yes** **Explanation:** - **Theoretical Probability:** The probability of landing on a 1 is \(\frac{1}{3}\) (~0.333). - **Experimental Probability:** In your experiment, the probability observed was \(\frac{1}{100}\) (0.01). While there's a significant difference between the experimental and theoretical probabilities in your results, the general principle holds that **a larger number of trials (100 in this case) tends to provide a more reliable and stable estimate of the true probability** compared to fewer trials (10). This is because larger samples reduce the impact of random variations and anomalies. However, it's also important to consider other factors that might affect the reliability of your experiment, such as: - **Randomness:** Ensure that each trial is independent. - **Bias:** Make sure there's no bias in how the trials are conducted. - **Consistency:** Ensure that the conditions remain consistent across all trials. In your specific case, observing only 1 favorable outcome out of 100 trials when the theoretical probability is \(\frac{1}{3}\) suggests that either more trials might be needed to approach the theoretical value, or there might be factors affecting the experiment's outcomes. --- **Summary:** Your answers to the questions are correct. Conducting more trials generally increases the reliability of experimental probability, bringing it closer to the theoretical probability. However, always ensure that the experimental setup is sound to obtain accurate and reliable results.

Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy

error msg
Explicar
Simplifique esta solución

Beyond the Answer

When engaging in probability experiments, it's essential to appreciate how results can fluctuate. Historically, the principle of probability dates back to the 16th century when mathematicians like Gerolamo Cardano began formalizing the study of chance through games of dice, laying the groundwork for modern probability theory. This early work paved the way for understanding not only gambling but also risk analysis in various fields. In the real world, conducting 100 trials gives you a more representative sample compared to just 10 trials. For instance, when rolling a die, the more times you roll, the closer your experimental probability will align with the theoretical probability. Using larger sample sizes reduces the impact of anomalies, making predictions and outcomes more reliable—just like trying out a new recipe more than once ensures that your dish turns out delicious every time!

preguntas relacionadas

Latest Probability Questions

¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde Hazte Premium
Estudiar puede ser una verdadera lucha
¿Por qué no estudiarlo en UpStudy?
Seleccione su plan a continuación
Prima

Puedes disfrutar

Empieza ahora
  • Explicaciones paso a paso
  • Tutores expertos en vivo 24/7
  • Número ilimitado de preguntas
  • Sin interrupciones
  • Acceso completo a Respuesta y Solución
  • Acceso completo al chat de PDF, al chat de UpStudy y al chat de navegación
Básico

Totalmente gratis pero limitado

  • Solución limitada
Bienvenido a ¡Estudia ahora!
Inicie sesión para continuar con el recorrido de Thoth AI Chat
Continuar con correo electrónico
O continuar con
Al hacer clic en "Iniciar sesión", acepta nuestros términos y condiciones. Términos de Uso & Política de privacidad