OUESTION 16 (FEB/MARCH 2013) Consider the sequence: \( 3 ; 9 ; 27 ; \ldots \) Jacob says that the fourth term of the sequence is 81 . Vusi disagrees and says that the furth term of the sequence is 16.1 Explain why Jacob and Vusi could both be correct. 16.2 Jacob and Vusi continue with their number patterns. Determine a formula for the \( n^{\text {th }} \) term of: 16.2 .1 16.2.2 Jacob's sequence Vusi's sequence
Solución de tutoría real
Responder
Solución
Revisado y aprobado por el equipo de tutoría de UpStudy
Beyond the Answer
The sequence \( 3, 9, 27, \ldots \) is actually a classic example of a geometric sequence where each term is multiplied by 3. This means the fourth term is indeed \( 3^4 = 81 \), supporting Jacob's claim. Vusi, on the other hand, could be referencing a completely different pattern or a misinterpretation where the sequence possibly doesn’t adhere to the same multiplication factor, thus arriving at his own value of 16. For Jacob's sequence, since it is geometric, the \( n^{\text{th}} \) term can be expressed as \( T_n = 3 \cdot 3^{n-1} = 3^n \). Vusi's sequence lacks clarity from the existing data, but assuming it follows a different rule or a sum of terms, one could explore various mathematical operations. For unique \( n \) values, like a simple arithmetic increase or another function altogether, creativity is key in establishing a formula!